On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:07:10 -0500 Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com> wrote: > Don't do that. You're basically saying that you have a repository > named foo but foo is two different things depending on how you run. > > [snip] > > Are there any genuine bugs in anything I described above? > > Shouldn't yum warn or error out when it sees the repodata arch > > conflict? > > repodata doesn't have an inherent archness. You can have repodata > containing packages of all arches. FWIW in pungi I use a single cache name for all arches. However for every single run I expire the metadata and require fresh metadata be downloaded. This seems to work for me, not many people have complained about getting new repodata every run. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature