[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: incoming: dependency warnings
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
- Subject: Re: incoming: dependency warnings
- Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 13:44:22 +0100
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 08:37 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Eg - yaboot is ppc32 only - as OF only supports booting 32bit ELF
> IIRC.
>
> ppc64-utils requires yaboot
> ppc64-utils in the ppc64 tree has a broken dep
>
> Therefore in the ppc64 only tree which doesn't have any biarch magic
> ppc64-utils will always be seen as broken.
Ah, I understand. But doesn't that mean the ppc64 compose isn't
bootable? I haven't tried it, but I thought it should give a fully
64-bit system.
Should we do the same (evil) trick as we do with memtest86 on x86_64 --
build a 64-bit package which actually contains 32-bit binaries?
--
dwmw2
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]