Re: sqlite

[Paul Nasrat <pnasrat redhat com>]

On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 13:28 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> AFAICT, the only reason sqlite is in Core rather than Extras is that rpm
> uses it.  (rpm doesn't tell me about any other dependencies on an
> Everything install.)  The package seems to be abandoned, as far as a
> maintainer.  Is that accurate?  Would rpm survive an upgrade of sqlite to
> the current version, 3.2.2?

I don't think it's going to be too much of an issue, the sqlite rpmdb is
not in common use in Fedora - Montavista are using it quite extensively,
I've spoken with Mark Hatle there and he hasn't tested yet, jbj seems to
have with external so I don't think we should expect any huge suprises.

Paul