[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: More status on the Extras buildsystem
- From: Ed Hill <ed eh3 com>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
- Subject: Re: More status on the Extras buildsystem
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:30:36 -0400
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 00:21 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> We should now be up and running with all of the build machines for the
> Extras build system. There are now 3 machines for doing x86_64 and i386
> builds and one machine for ppc builds. I've successfully done a build
> for FE3, FE4 and the development tree and so think everything should be
> sanely set up. If not, DO NOT SEND MAIL TO SETH :-) You can send mail
> here, to fedora-extras-list or file a bug in bugzilla against the Fedora
> Infrastructure product, buildsys component.
Thank you for the explanation!
I have no idea whether the following is a bug or my incompetence so
please point out either. ;-)
cvs co rpms/opendap rpms/nco
for i in opendap nco ; do
for j in FC-3 FC-4 devel ; do
( cd rpms/${i}/${j} ; make tag ; make plague )
done
done
which seems to work just fine judging by the output generated.
Unfortunately, the command
plague-client list email ed eh3 com
lists only the three udunits builds that I submitted yesterday using,
AFAICT, exactly the same procedure. And they seem to have built without
any problems.
So, what went wrong this time? Can anyone help me figure it out...?
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 mit edu ed eh3 com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]