Re: mismatch of versions between arches

[Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk redhat com>]

+1

Tracker bugs are good in so many ways.

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan
      Red Hat Summit ] [
         New Orleans ] [ Learn. Network. Experience Open Source.
     June 1/2/3 2005 ] [ (And Make Your Boss Pay For It.) 
                       [ http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 12.05.2005, 08:55 +0200 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:32:06 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 07:36 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > How about the date get set to start around 26th May? This gives us
> > > relatively enough time to rebuild, and get things fixed before 6th June.
> > Fedora Extras FC4 target bugs
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=157183
> > 
> > (would be great if the dep tree listed the architecture, too, btw)
> 
> We could create more tracker bugs: "FC4 x86_64 tracker"  "FC4 ppc
> tracker"; Those could be dep bugs for the "FC4 general tracker" bug. You
> would see the arch deps in that dependecytree then. 
> 
> Similar like Bug 155836 in the dep-tree of 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=136450
> 
> I was planing something like that anyway to track x86_64 bugs better.
> 
> Just my 2 cent
> 
> -- 
> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
>