Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>]

On Sun, 29 May 2005 11:49:35 -0400 (EDT), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:

> 
> Maybe the real answer is that there should be bug state for bugs that are 
> closed without having been fixed:
> 
> CLOSED NOTFIXED.
> 
> Not judgmental, just factual.  And for comments, check the bug.

It implies too much. It can be inaccurate (false even) and misleading
again in all the cases where a reporter didn't reply to NEEDINFO.