Re: The impending end of FC2 NEEDINFO bugs...

[Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk redhat com>]

Every state implies too much.  The whole problem we're running into here 
is that people are reading too much into one word.

Maybe "CLOSED SEECOMMENT" is the right way to go.

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan
      Red Hat Summit ] [
         New Orleans ] [ Learn. Network. Experience Open Source.
     June 1/2/3 2005 ] [ (And Make Your Boss Pay For It.) 
                       [ http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/

On Sun, 29 May 2005, Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Sun, 29 May 2005 11:49:35 -0400 (EDT), Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Maybe the real answer is that there should be bug state for bugs that are 
> > closed without having been fixed:
> > 
> > CLOSED NOTFIXED.
> > 
> > Not judgmental, just factual.  And for comments, check the bug.
> 
> It implies too much. It can be inaccurate (false even) and misleading
> again in all the cases where a reporter didn't reply to NEEDINFO.
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
>