[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: some minor Core pruning



star doesn't need autoconf213 since star-1.5a74-3

On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:04:19 -0400
Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote:

> Steve Grubb (sgrubb redhat com) said: 
> > On Monday 12 June 2006 17:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > This isn't exhaustive, by any means; there are still quite a few
> > > leaf nodes that are potential Extras candidates. 
> > 
> > I was wondering why we have autoconf213, automake14, and automake15
> > still in the repo? I was able to eliminate them from my build tree
> > 2 years ago. Also, is there any reason to keep byacc? I was able to
> > substitute bison for everything that wanted byacc and eliminated it
> > from my buildtree too.
> 
> # repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps autoconf213 automake14
> automake15 --archlist i686,i386,noarch,src --repoid development
> --repoid development-source mozilla-37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5.src
> gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src star-0:1.5a74-2.src
> tetex-0:3.0-24.src
> pam_smb-0:1.1.7-7.2.src
> emacs-0:21.4-14.1.src
> libIDL-0:0.8.6-5.src
> metacity-0:2.15.5-5.src
> gnome-mag-0:0.12.5-1.src
> gtk+-1:1.2.10-50.src
> gdm-1:2.15.3-7.src
> gnome-session-0:2.15.1-4.src
> librsvg2-0:2.15.0-1.src
> libwmf-0:0.2.8.4-8.src
> nss_db-0:2.2-35.src
> 
> Bill
> 
> --
> Fedora-maintainers mailing list
> Fedora-maintainers redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]