[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
- From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-maintainers redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:44:24 -0500
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 08:35 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > ------- Additional Comments From jko redhat com 2006-06-15 02:45 EST -------
> > ------- Additional Comments From jkeating redhat com 2006-06-11 11:04 EST -------
> > NEEDSWORK
> > - Brew doesn't support %{?dist} tag anymore, so this will not evaluate when built.
> Why? I thought, RH was going to use the *same* conventions as Fedora?
>
> Apparently not ...
Brew never supported %{?dist} tag, and the guidelines say that Core
packages can't expect that tag to be there. HOWEVER: Just because they
can't use the actual dist tag, if they want to add any sort of suffix,
they have to use the dist tag syntax.
~spot
--
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]