[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
- From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
- Cc: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Bug 192912] Review Request: paps
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:09:15 +0200
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 07:44 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 08:35 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > ------- Additional Comments From jko redhat com 2006-06-15 02:45 EST -------
> > > ------- Additional Comments From jkeating redhat com 2006-06-11 11:04 EST -------
> > > NEEDSWORK
> > > - Brew doesn't support %{?dist} tag anymore, so this will not evaluate when built.
> > Why? I thought, RH was going to use the *same* conventions as Fedora?
> >
> > Apparently not ...
>
> Brew never supported %{?dist} tag,
... never say "never" ... ;)
> and the guidelines say that Core
> packages can't expect that tag to be there.
Well, exactly this is one of the points I consider to be a "must-be
discussed soon".
At least I consider consistent and clear conventions on "NEVR"'s, which
%dist is part of, to be a minimum requirement for closer and better
Core<->Extra (+external repos) interaction.
To me, the current situation leaves much to be desired.
Ralf
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]