Denis Leroy wrote:
> The package seems to deal with two different tarballs, and generate
> libgpod (0.4.2) and compat-libgpod (0.3.2) from the same spec file.
>
> This is somewhat unusual, should this get review approval ? I would
> prefer if the package were split in two personally.
The compat-libgpod package is only generated for FC6 and isn't part of
the F7/devel branch. I did the review on the devel branch only, as it
seemed to me that the other branches weren't relevant for the purposes
of the merge. Is that not the case?
I was the one who submitted the changes to Alex for the compat-libgpod
package in the FC6 spec. I believe Alex suggested that since it was
going to be short-lived there wasn't too much reason to make it a
separate package. I'm not sure what the policy or standard practice
is regarding compat- packages. Pointers and examples would be
welcome, of course, even if it's not totally relevant in this case.
BTW, apologies for not adding a link to the bug in my previous post.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226022
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
======================================================================
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
and I'm not sure about the the universe.
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Attachment:
pgpdx9p5iUujR.pgp
Description: PGP signature