Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags

["Christopher Stone" <chris stone gmail com>]

On 1/30/07, Warren Togami <wtogami redhat com> wrote:
> Warren Togami wrote:
> > Further filing of review bugs is blocking on two issues:
> >
> > 1) We must decide whether or not the review should be assigned to the
> > reviewer or package owner.  I believe package owner is more logical,
> > because that person is accountable to doing the work.  The reviewer is
> > already tracked by name in the flag itself, which too is logical.
>
> OK, it seems the only real drawback to "ASSIGNED to owner instead of
> reviewer" is Tibbs' good point about being able to see it on frontpage.cgi.

Guys, I have to say this constant switching back and forth of ASIGNEE
is not a good idea.  Not only is it a pain in the keister to keep on
switching the ASIGNEE back and forth like a tennis ball, but if the
packager forgets to do this, then the reviewer will never get e-mails
on the bug.