[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)

From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
Subject: Re: VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:54:25 -0500

Warren Togami (wtogami redhat com) said: 
> One possibility is that fedora-cvs might be requested once, something 
> done, and fedora-cvs might be requested again.  ? meaning "I need CVS 
> admin attention".  It could be cleared after CVS admin is no longer needed.
> 
> I suppose it could be +, but what is the actual benefit?

Someone could see that the request is handled. If someone needs further
changes, it's set back to '?'.

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)
  - From: Warren Togami

References:
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Christopher Stone
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Christian Iseli
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Christopher Stone
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Michael Schwendt
- Re: Process Change: Package Reviews with Flags
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)
  - From: Warren Togami
- Re: VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: VOTE: CVS Admin with Flags (Version 2)
  - From: Warren Togami

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]