Topics for this week's Release Engineering meeting?
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Mon Jun 18 17:11:33 UTC 2007
On Monday 18 June 2007 13:09:55 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I am not sure how it would hurt the user if we enforce good practices
> using tools as opposed to retroactively fixing it after the users get
> hit by the problems. Can you explain? Can bug reports be automated for
> existing packages? Can a RFE be filed against the build system to
> prevent new packages from being introduced into the repository with such
> issues?
Because it's not just about new packages, so just dropping a package which
grows a file conflict isn't a good solution as that leaves the end user
holding the bag. Also a new package may have perfectly valid files/provides
but an existing package has the improper one, so why penalize the new correct
package because of the errors of an existing package. Just dropping the
package again hides the problem instead of fixing it.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070618/62c425ba/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list