[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- From: Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms net>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:22:47 +0200
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:14:51PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:58 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > samba and nss_db for example are currently not broken and would break
> > the second you apply your proposal on it. That's a fact, not a
> > fallacy.
>
> Do elicidate. Not because I think there's even the remotest likelihood
> that you have a point, but because I find you amusing.
You already read (over) it. Go up exactly three levels over your own
post and be amused.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpqb19fVpYFO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]