[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- From: Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms net>
- To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:38:08 +0200
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:43:02AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 22:22 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > You already read (over) it. Go up exactly three levels over your own
> > post and be amused.
>
> Oh, I see. You're talking about the mtime bug and pretending it's a
> problem with splitting packages.
No, no relation to the mtime bug. I now really need to think whether
you don't want to read or can't read the relevant parts. Neither is
really an improvement, so it probably doesn't matter.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpDF1Ul3W8OC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
- Re: [F8/multilib] {,/usr}/{,s}bin64 (was: Split libperl from perl)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]