Re: [Guidelines Change] Conflicts

["Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>]

On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 17:06 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> Just wondering (and *not* meant as a critique!): Wasn't the "unwritten
> rule" that the Packaging Committee handles theoretical packaging while
> FESCo handles practical packaging? Or did I get something wrong?
> 
> *If* the Packaging Committee handles practical packaging like "Approve
> Conflicts" I'd suggest we should consider moving "Request for packages
> with static libs" and maybe "Appoval requests for kmod packages" from
> FESCo's duty's over to the Packaging Committee.

Not quite sure. Does FESCo want to handle "practical packaging" or push
it to the FPC?

~spot