[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070510) FESCO meeting
- From: Alex Lancaster <alexl users sourceforge net>
- To: fedora-maintainers redhat com
- Subject: Re: Plan for tomorrows (20070510) FESCO meeting
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 04:37:37 -0700
>>>>> "DL" == Denis Leroy writes:
[...]
DL> My thoughts exactly. I don't understand why python is so
DL> special. If there's community interest in a compat package of an
DL> old version of anything (gcc 3.2 for example. it mysteriously
DL> disappeared in FC-6 even though the SRPM is in the repo), just let
DL> people work on the compat packages. There's too much emphasis on
DL> "teaching upstream a lesson", and literally NO emphasis on the
DL> interest to end-users. It sounds like some of you are afraid that
DL> the word will spread about fedora shipping the old python 2.4 and
DL> zope upstream maintainers will suddenly stop all porting
DL> efforts. That's absurd.
+1
There needs to a balance between lags in upstream and the interests of
users. Bleeding edge shouldn't mean obsoleting things just because
they don't always work with the absolutely latest release of
everything.
Alex
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]