[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora review
- From: Sankarshan Mukhopadhay <sankar redhat com>
- To: marc w smlintl com au, Discussions on expanding the Fedora user base <fedora-marketing-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Fedora review
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:14:37 +0530
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
> I don't know if this has been posted on the list or not but situations
> like this need to be looked at because it can only hinder the progress of
> Fedora over time unfortunately.
>
> http://distrocenter.linux.com/distrocenter/05/07/11/2327245.shtml?tid=107&tid=127
If you mean the following:
<quote>
> Worse, Fedora Core 4 gets low marks for multimedia.
</quote>
Most of them would be answered here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems
Rgds
SM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC3Hcl+g4kmZ76nyERAgoCAJ0Y73o3Md0H8JtTPBa10d/6pcfQjACcC516
8tiDbCwC6+VAKsr0es1fFOc=
=HSnG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]