Fedora derivatives branding discussion

[Rudolf Kastl]

2006/4/20, Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net>:
> On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 20:03 +0200, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> > but just a question... what if i add a single package that isnt yet in
> > extras nor core... am i not allowed to call it "based on fedora" with
> > only minor changes that are documented in a clean way?
> > with having a distro that is 99,9% fedora (e.g. a live cd... e.g. with
> > distcc...) wouldnt it be still based on fedora from a pure technical
> > point of view?
> > How would i be able to call that live cd then?
>
> That is no longer based on Fedora.  That includes parts of Fedora, but
> adds to it, and thus cannot be claimed to be Fedora.  Get the package in
> Extras (;

but its still derived from fedora isnt it? distcc is hanging idle in
bugzilla for ages :)
someone finish the review.

regards,
Rudolf Kastl


>
> --
> Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
> Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
> GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBER84+4v2HLvE71NURAvs8AJ9rRMEFj7UlWdPFSfuOFkwZc1HfiQCgvL/Z
> F7w4E343p6FGl6TEZjrxejc=
> =Efy5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
>