Christoph Strobel wrote:
Hello Gabriel!
Question: since I intend, when the company will be in
"steady-state", to work on a free Linux distro, while
supporting it, would you please let me know what would be the
connection points, from the practical standpoint, between RHEL
and Fedora, compared to other free distros? I'd like to use on
some servers the RH supported licenses, and on others a free
distro, the "closest" possible to RH. Would be Fedora this one
(and why)?
Fedora is still widely known as the "Linux made by RedHat", this
fact in one hand and the option to "upgrade" to RHEL without big
differences in using and maintaining the system in the other hand is
a good equipment for talking to your customers.
This is something I'd be careful with. Fedora and RHEL are only
similar in the sense that they are both Red Hat-based distributions.
But there is *no* upgrade path from Fedora to RHEL. In other words,
to upgrade from Fedora to RHEL you have to do a clean reinstall.
That's not to say I wouldn't recommend Fedora (of course), but you
don't want to imply that there is an easy in-place upgrade from
Fedora to RHEL.
Generally speaking, we also want to move away from fedora being the
"Linux made by Red Hat". Fedora is community based and many of the
important contributions come from non-Red Hat folks. That said, I
understand that the impression is out there. This is the elevator
pitch: "What is Fedora? Fedora is a set of projects sponsored by Red
Hat and guided by the contributors. These projects are developed by
a large community of people who strive to provide and maintain the
very best in free, open source software and standards."