Tejas Dinkar wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:50 -0400, Jeremy Hogan wrote:I just don't se why they can't acknowledge that Fedora is great, which makes RHEL even greater.They way I see it, RHEL is just a way for Red Hat to get some money, so they can invest it into improving Fedora. In any case, I object to the quoted statement. What's so great about RHEL anyway, that it is greater than fedora? --T
What's so great about an apple that makes it greater than a orange sort of question. I dont think thats the argument presented anywhere. RHEL is better suited for a certain class of people and industries who want a longer lifecycle, support agreements among other benefits. Obviously if Red Hat thought that RHEL is always greater than Fedora, it wouldnt be investing anything in Fedora at all.
Rahul