[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora's mid-life crisis -- YUM v. APT v. SmartPM
- From: "Bryan J. Smith" <b j smith ieee org>
- To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base <fedora-marketing-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Fedora's mid-life crisis -- YUM v. APT v. SmartPM
- Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:42:23 -0400
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 02:40 +0600, Imtiaz Rahi wrote:
> Only painful thing to me is YUM. RPM packages are good but YUM, Pirut
> and others are not good enough.
> Synaptic is still better to see what updates are available, then
> choose one and find out what are the dependencies which are going to
> be downloaded and etc.
Why stop at Apt/Synaptic?
Why not just look at Smart Package Manager (aka SmartPM aka Smart)?
GUIs are standard. Dependency resolution is outstanding, etc...
Also, last time I checked, Apt had _not_ addressed multi-architecture.
Anything Debian-based is still using chroot for i386 support.
> Why don't we arrange a poll ?
Why don't people contribute and directly change what they don't like?
;)
--
Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance
mailto:b j smith ieee org http://thebs413.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------
Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]