Marek Mahut wrote:
> Karsten Wade wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
>>>> Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit :
>>>> Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL
>>>> and Fedora
>>> This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again.
>>
>> Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again?
>>
>>> Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think
>>> like
>>> i do.
>>
>> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for
>> Ambassadors.
>
> As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general.
>
> "... that we not connect hats, red in color or otherwise ..."[1]
>
>
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct
>
This may actually pose a problem for me as I regularly (especially in
the rain) wear a black fedora, and a few people have asked me if the
fact I support Fedora is because of, or related to, this.
Not that I intentionally connect the two, but average folk still seem to
make that link...
--
Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben lewis benl co uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./ PGP Key: 0x647E480C
"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
-- RFC 1118
begin:vcard fn:Benjamin Lewis (tc1415) n:Lewis;Benjamin email;internet:ben lewis benl co uk x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature