[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Question about our Brand
- From: David Nalley <david gnsa us>
- To: For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base <fedora-marketing-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Question about our Brand
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:07:14 -0400
Paul Stauffer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:34:21PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> Fedora is heavily linked - I would say Beta version - because the two
>
> Argh. Please avoid using the word "beta", or even terms like "proving
> ground"!
Quite right, I intended to say "wouldn't". That is what I get for typing
while distracted.
>
> Language like this just serves to further the widespread mistaken impression
> that Fedora only exists as some sort of experimental test subject for RHEL,
> and encourages the idea that Fedora is not a production-quality distro in
> its own right.
>
> Fedora is the major upstream source for RHEL. As such, it has great value
> to Red Hat, and so Red Hat supports it. I think that should be the simple
> summary of the relationship which any ambassador should be able to explain.
>
> - Paul
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]