Associating the Red Hat and Fedora brands?

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 20:43 +0200, JoergSimon wrote: 
> Am Dienstag, 1. April 2008 18:45:59 schrieb Karsten 'quaid' Wade:
> > A quick discussion halt here.
> >
> > Joerg -- your reply was made to a related but *completely different
> > discussion*.  Greg's comment you quoted refers to a policy, not a
> > particular action.
> 
> Karsten, i answered direct to a Topic from Greg called 
> "Associating the Red Hat and Fedora brands?"   
> <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/2008-March/msg00300.html>
> He asked for opinions and in my eyes this answer was related.  
> I would love to explain it more eloquent, but i am not so skilled with the 
> english language. Maybe some of my words are to straight - sorry for that.
> First off all, as private Person i have a shadowman sticker on my notebook ;-)

Thanks, your arguments make sense to me and give me more to consider.

Definitely I can see how having a Red Hat brand at events would make
your work harder.  For Fedora, we need a process to honor sponsors
without confusing the brand.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-marketing-list/attachments/20080407/2a64fc4d/attachment.sig>