[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Omega 10 Desktop Linux
- From: Luca Foppiano <luca foppiano org>
- To: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org>
- Cc: The Fedora Project Community in India <fedora-india redhat com>, For discussions about marketing and expanding the Fedora user base <fedora-marketing-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Omega 10 Desktop Linux
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:27:50 +0200
On Tue, 2008-09-30 at 14:26 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Fedora already has different spins - xfce, kde, games, developer live cd
> and others. I maintain a couple of them even. This is essentially
> similar but rebranded since it used packages outside of the official
> Fedora repository.
Spins belong to Fedora, maintains the same policy and the same rules.
AFAIK Omega ship proprietary codec and non-free packages. is this true?
If yes, I don't think official fedora spins ship that packages.
> I never used the term "Fedora based" in my announcements.
Is this phrase not the same?
"Omega is a desktop/mobile Linux distribution that is
based upon Fedora but includes packages from the Livna RPM repository."
I'm trying to understand if and what are the advantages to have another
distribution.
Luca
--
Today is Pungenday, the 54th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3174
You will have many recoverable tape errors.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]