Adding new activities to comps.xml

Martin Dengler martin at martindengler.com
Tue Mar 10 23:46:44 UTC 2009


On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:43:39PM -0500, Steven M. Parrish wrote:
> We have added quite a few new activiies to Fedora in the past few weeks.  As 
> it stands now they are not installed by default when someone does a  
> 
> yum groupinstall "SUGAR Desktop Environment"
> 
> So the question is do we want them to be installed by default or left to the 
> user to manually install.

Of the four obvious answers:

1) Add them all
2) Add any/all "Fructose"[1] packages and a "minimal"[2] set
3) Add "minimal"[2] set: sugar-update-control, sugar-help, sugar-read
(of what you mentioned was available)
4) Add none

...If I had a vote I'd say +1 to "Fructose" packages + minimal set (my
option #2 above).  I'm +0 on adding them all.  And I would be -1 on
not including any, since that's not really appropriate to the audience
(if you're not picking packages individually you want someone to give
you something useful right away, which sugar without any activities is
not).

> Steven

Martin

1. http://sugarlabs.org/go/Taxonomy#Fructose:_The_set_of_demonstration_activities
2. Cue arguing about what's minimal.

PS - thanks for the packaging efforts!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-olpc-list/attachments/20090310/177af9dd/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-olpc-list mailing list