[Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-09-01 10:25 EST -------
This package is very simple and there exists little
problems or questions.


First review of geda-examples :

1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :

   * Requires
   * File and Directory Ownership

     - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem,
     however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem?

     I mean that for example, xorg-x11-docs maybe unuseful without
     xorg-x11 installed, however, xorg-x11-docs itself does not
     require anything.

     If the problem is only for the ownership of 
     %{_datadir}/gEDA/ (owned by geda-schem), this is a good
     reason for geda-symbols to own %{_datadir}/gEDA/, too, and
     the requirement for geda-gschem can be removed.
     You can see for example that /usr/share/X11/ is owned by
     several packages, e.g.
         imake, libX11, xorg-x11-xsm, xorg-x11-apps, .....

     - Another thing is %{_datadir}/gEDA/examples . This is
     also owned by geda-gschem. If you think that this package
     (geda-examples) really requires geda-gschem, then the entry
     of %dir %{gedaexampledir} can be removed.

     Well, the problem of ownership of directories is complicated
     when there are several packages which are mutually related.

2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :

     = Nothing.

3. Other things I have noticed:

     = Nothing.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.