[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-package-review redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 204601] Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA
- Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 20:39:32 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah yahoo com au 2006-09-01 20:39 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> This package is very simple and there exists little
> problems or questions.
>
>
> First review of geda-examples :
>
> 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
>
> * Requires
> * File and Directory Ownership
>
> - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem,
> however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem?
>
> I mean that for example, xorg-x11-docs maybe unuseful without
> xorg-x11 installed, however, xorg-x11-docs itself does not
> require anything.
>
The files provided by this package can be read via schematic editor. That is why
it requires geda-gschem
Updated:
Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec
SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060123-4.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]