[Bug 205041] Review Request: tellico - collection manager
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 3 05:35:25 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tellico - collection manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205041
kevin at tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-03 01:35 EST -------
OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
a7ecc139d820279b0a89d8f594110094 tellico-1.2.tar.gz
a7ecc139d820279b0a89d8f594110094 tellico-1.2.tar.gz.1
See below - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - No rpmlint output.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should include License or ask upstream to include it.
See below - Should build in mock.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
Issues:
1. In your desktop-file-install you have --vendor="", but according
to guidelines that should be --vendor=fedora. Also, this causes
builds under mock to fail because the fedora-tellio.desktop file doesn't
exist.
2. INSTALL NEWS README can probibly all be dropped. INSTALL is the generic
auto* install document, NEWS and README are both of size 0.
3. The Summary is a bit generic:
Summary: collection manager
Perhaps at least add that it's a KDE based collection manager?
4. rpmlint says:
W: tellico summary-not-capitalized collection manager
So, it should at least be "A KDE collection manager"
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list