[Bug 196120] Review Request: gresistor
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 3 13:17:26 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gresistor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196120
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-03 09:17 EST -------
First review of gresistor:
1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* Licensing
- Well, it seems that this package is distributed under
GPL (my recognition is that GPL is more strict than LGPL,
so if the package includes the code of both GPL and LGPL,
the license of the whole package is GPL, perhaps).
However, it would be better that you ask for upstream to
clarify the license (from the discussion above, it seems
you have already did it).
* Requires:
- python <- required by pygtk2-libglade
Also, this package requires python(abi) = 2.4.
* Compiler flags
- Well, usually CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is needed, however,
how about for this package? This src package don't have any .c
files and this is a NOARCH package, so CFLAGS should not be
necessary.
2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets :
* Requires(post,postun)
- Well, all of Requires(post,postun) seems unnecessary accoding to
the URL above. (%post, %postun scriptlets are necessary),
* GTK+ icon cache
- No icons are installed under /usr/share/icons. Perhaps it is
better that
+ create symlink under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps which
points to /usr/share/gresistor/icon.png
+ fix (fedora-)gresistor.desktop
+ and call gtk-update-icon-cache
3. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
= Nothing.
4. Other things I have noticed:
= Nothing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list