[Bug 192600] Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600


tcallawa at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
OtherBugsDependingO|182235                      |
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat.com  2006-09-09 22:02 EST -------
FSF says no:

> 2.3   Restrictions.  Licensee agrees that it will not use the Software in a way 
> inconsistent with the license granted in Section 2.1.  Further, Licensee agrees
> that, in 
> exercising its rights under the license granted to it in this Agreement,
> Licensee will: 
> (i) strictly adhere to and fully comply with the Specifications; 

No way.

> (ii) use the
> Trademark, 
> and no other mark, to identify the Software, the Documentation, the
> Specifications and any 
> Products that implement the Specifications;

Nope.

>  (iii) place, in a font or graphic
> design 
> designated by InMon,  the phrase "sFlow(R)" on any technical documentation, 
> sales/marketing materials, catalogs, or other such materials relating to
> products it 
> manufactures or markets which it has configured to be compatible with the
> Software or 
> otherwise implement the Specifications;

Probably, but not certainly, overbroad.

*****

I'm closing this bug out WONTFIX. If you can get this under a different license,
please reopen.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.