[Bug 193106] Review Request: gtkmozembedmm
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Sep 12 02:16:31 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gtkmozembedmm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193106
------- Additional Comments From kevin at tummy.com 2006-09-11 22:16 EST -------
0. ok.
1. Can you provide a quick script to get the cvs version you are using?
2. Sounds reasonable. I think there is movement to get a seperate package that
provides this in fc7+, but for now this is the best solution.
3, 4, 5, 6: ok.
Now that I can get it to build in mock, rpmlint says:
W: gtkmozembedmm unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgtkmozembedmm-
1.4.so.0.0.0
E: gtkmozembedmm-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package
These two are likely the permissions on the library being 644 instead of 755,
so they don't properly get stripped and debuginfo collected. Change that file
to 755 and it should clear up those issues.
E: gtkmozembedmm-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
Some of the path's look wrong:
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/include
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 289 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/include/gtkmozembedmmconfig.h
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4/convert.m4
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1154 Sep 11 20:08 /usr/lib/
gtkmozembedmm-1.4/proc/m4/convert_gtkmozembedmm.m4
Shouldn't that be /usr/include/gtkmozembedmm/ ?
not sure where the m4 files should go, but /usr/lib/ seems wrong...
W: gtkmozembedmm-devel no-documentation
This can be ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list