[Bug 201000] Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libFoundation - A free implementation of OpenStep's Foundation Kit


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201000


toshio at tiki-lounge.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |toshio at tiki-lounge.com




------- Additional Comments From toshio at tiki-lounge.com  2006-09-15 13:50 EST -------
In addition to the simple pollution of /usr/include, since this is one possible
implementation of part of the OpenStep specification, does it make sense to
namespace things with some sort of upstream vendor directory?  Or is it going to
be an "official" implementation of OpenStep's FoundationKit on Linux?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.