[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-package-review redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:36:59 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433
------- Additional Comments From enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de 2006-09-20 16:36 EST -------
Reviewers want the one-package structure but do not give a single argument why
this should be done or why multiple packages are bad.
I gave arguments why I chose the multi-package structure and nobody responded to
these arguments so far.
> initng ... I still don't see it in the upcoming FC6
initng is an Extras candidate and can be added after FC6 release
> ... package that are considered 'always present', such as lvm2 ...
ok; this might be a response to my arguments. But I do not think that this is a
valid one. 'lvm2' is always present due to packaging bugs only (mixed
initscripts and core-functionality; bloated 'initscripts' package).
I can not fix the other packages because I would have to make this discussion at
lot of other packages. RH developers are usually ignorant regarding dependency
issues (e.g. look at aspell -> perl dep, sendmail -> cyrus-sasl, initscripts ->
low-level stuff) so this would be a lost battle at least in Core.
What I can do, is to package my packages properly and to separate
core-functionality and unneeded/big dependencies which is giving users with e.g.
chroots or non-SysV init a chance for a small system.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]