[Bug 206222] Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Sep 23 16:56:32 UTC 2006


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: manaworld-music - music for the manaworld game
Alias: manaworld-music

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206222


chris.stone at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From chris.stone at gmail.com  2006-09-23 12:56 EST -------
- rpmlint output clean
- package named according to package naming guidelines
- spec file name matches package %{name}
- package meets packaging guidelines
- package is licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license is included in %doc
- spec file written in American english
- spec file is legible
- package successfully builds on x86_64 FC5
- package does not use locales
- package does not contain shared library files
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicates in %files
- permissions on files set properly
- package contains proper %clean section
- macro usage is consistent
- package contains permissible content
- package does not contain large documentation
- files in %doc do not affect runtime
- no header files or static libraries present
- no pkgconfig files present
- no library files with suffix present
- no devel subpackage required
- no .la files present
- not a GUI app needing a .desktop file
- package does not own files or directories owned by other packages


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list