[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-package-review redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 207473] Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:05:46 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ruby-activerecord - Implements the ActiveRecord pattern for ORM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207473
------- Additional Comments From dlutter redhat com 2006-09-26 14:05 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Is active_support really required? I don't see anything in the code that uses it.
Yes, it is .. $sitelibdir/active_record.rb requires it and gets grumpy if it's
not there. Since active_support modifies some of the core classes, users of
active_record can (and should) expect those additional methods to be there, no
matter how active_record was installed (tarball, gem, or rpm)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]