[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-package-review redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 199108] Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:44:37 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gutenprint: Printer Drivers Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199108
peter thecodergeek com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |peter thecodergeek com
------- Additional Comments From peter thecodergeek com 2006-09-28 00:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #67)
> > It looks like the libgutenprintui libraries in the main package need gtk
> > libgutenprintui.so.1
> > libgutenprintui2.so.1
> >
> > I don't know if they can be split off or not... Parag?
>
> I don't think we should split them and create a new package. Those are part of
> gutenprint-devel package. And as all *.so.1 files must go to -devel packages,
> ther are already there.
Why should they be in the -devel subpackage? It was my understanding that only
the unversioned shared object files must be in the -devel subpackage (*.so); and
versioned libraries (*.so.N and so on) should be in the main package or a -libs
subpackage or something similar, as appropriate. Is this not the case here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]