[Bug 208250] Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers

[bugzilla redhat com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250


mtasaka ioa s u-tokyo ac jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody fedoraproject org    |mtasaka ioa s u-tokyo ac jp
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From mtasaka ioa s u-tokyo ac jp  2006-09-29 04:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in 
> a 
> > package from which pikloop depends.
> 
> piklab of course :-)

Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses.
in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot.
However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel.

So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem
for rebuilding is resolved.

I have not yet reviewed this fully, however,
* rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should
  have no longer than 79 characters.
* Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem
  for FC5, too).
* Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be
  /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.