[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Fedora-packaging] Re: Requires: initscripts?
- From: Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>
- To: fedora-packaging redhat com
- Subject: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Requires: initscripts?
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 18:06:39 +0200
Matthias Saou
<thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>
writes:
> I've never added "Requires: initscripts" to packages which contain an
> init script before.
When your initscripts do not work without /etc/init.d/functions and the
initscripts are an essential part of your package (e.g. not sample
%doc), you have to add corresponding Requires: entries.
> So my question : As long as the Requires(...) for the scriplets are fine
> in order to get the package properly installed, updated and erased, do
> we still need to add that explicit requirement?
It depends how far we want to abuse rpm bugs/missing features. With
current rpm, it is fine to add only the tagged Requires(...) because
they implicate an untagged Requires: too.
The feature, that deps from Requires(post/preun): can be removed after
installation, and will be reinstalled at removal, is not implemented,
afaik.
Enrico
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]