[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Requires: initscripts?
- From: Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Requires: initscripts?
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 16:24:01 +0200
Axel Thimm wrote :
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 03:05:22PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Matthias Saou (thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net) said:
> > > Nothing fancy. Just a simple "service" to have run on startup, control
> > > with chkconfig and service. I don't think "Requires: initscripts" would
> > > improve nor fix anything, but I wanted an authoritative answer to be
> > > 100% sure :-)
> >
> > If you require /sbin/service, initscripts will get pulled in...
>
> Looks like the wrong people sit in the FPC - this was just too obvious
> and our brains jammed in accord.
Not entirely... since /sbin/service is only Requires(preun) and
Requires(postun), nothing is making initscripts a "pre" or runtime
requirement of the package AFAICT.
I still can't really picture a working system which wouldn't have
initscripts installed, though.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.20-1.2948.fc6
Load : 0.18 0.33 0.43
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]