Re: [Fedora-packaging] Packaging guidelines for Emacsen add-on packages

["Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan underwood gmail com>]

On 30/05/07, Jonathan Underwood <jonathan underwood gmail com> wrote:
> On 27/05/07, Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi> wrote:
> > Regarding the current Emacsen add-on draft,
> >
> > * Added some more info about requiring a version of (X)Emacs newer than or
> > equal to the one used to compile the *.elcs, and how to find that version out
> > dynamically during package build.
> >
>
> Actually, I was just testing this, and it doesn't work.
>
> You added these macros:
> %define emacsversion v=$(rpm -q --qf=%%{VERSION} emacs) ; case $v in
> 2*) echo $v ;; *) echo 0 ;; esac
>
> %define xemacsversion v=$(rpm -q --qf=%%{VERSION} xemacs) ; case $v in
> 2*) echo $v ;; *) echo 0 ;; esac
>
> And so whenthere is a Requires: emacs-common >= %{emacsversion} you
> get an error like this:
>
> error: line 21: Dependency tokens must begin with alpha-numeric, '_'
> or '/': Requires:  emacs-common >= v=$(rpm -q --qf=%{VERSION} emacs) ;
> case $v in 2*) echo $v ;; *) echo 0 ;; esac

Also, this wouldn't work as intended on a system where more than one
arch of the emacs package is installed - eg. on my system i seem to
have emacs.x86_64 and emacs.i386 installed, and so

rpm -q --qf=%{VERSION} emacs

gives 22.0.9922.0.99.

Granted, that wouldn't happen in a mock chroot buildroot, but still, I
think we should do a bit better than that :) Can't see how though :(

J.

> J.