On Fr September 7 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Friday 07 September 2007, Till Maas wrote: > > On Do September 6 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > I would personally call it python-fuse anyway for consistency, and > > > perhaps add "Provides: fuse-python = VR", but maybe that's just me. > > > > Is doing it the other way round not good enough? > > > > Name: fuse-python > > Provides: python-fuse = VR > > Good enough for whom? Both of those definitely satisfy the current naming Good enough for a user, will there be any differences if one uses yum to search for "fuse-python" or "python-fuse" or will both produce the same result? Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.