[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] tex related packages naming
- From: Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] tex related packages naming
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:36:01 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 07:45 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:53:32PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 00:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Could it be possible for the packaging commitee to decide on that issue,
>>>> please? The proposals are:
>>>>
>>>> * prefix with tex-
>>>> * no specific naming. Prefix with tex- when another package has the same
>>>> name
>>>>
>>>> Could it be possible to have a vote/decision on that issue?
>>> Please pick one and propose it to us. (Or both, as they seem to work
>>> well together).
>> I can't propose one, since there are people that want one and other
>> that want the other. I am asking for a ruling by the packaging
>> commitee.
>
> Fair enough. I propose that we change the prefix from tetex- to tex-,
> since these packages were prefixed before.
>
If email voting is sufficient for this,
+1 to making the prefix tex-
- -Toshio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG9FVhX6yAic2E7kgRApByAKCf3aAqqqEk1aMqmuXlRFe1xLCplgCfa1MP
YHzK0+IvO6coB8JpJRTde9Y=
=c13X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]