[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages

From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu>
To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
Date: 21 Sep 2007 23:08:13 -0500

>>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com> writes:

TK> This looks like a good change.  Anyone object to me going ahead
TK> and changing it?

No objection here; removing inconsistencies from ScriptletSnippets is
always a good thing.  Using --quiet is probably the best choice if
it's supported as far back as we need it to be.

 - J<

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Matthias Clasen

References:
- [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Toshio Kuratomi

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]