Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages

[Ralf Corsepius <rc040203 freenet de>]

On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 00:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 23:08 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com> writes:
> > 
> > TK> This looks like a good change.  Anyone object to me going ahead
> > TK> and changing it?
> > 
> > No objection here; removing inconsistencies from ScriptletSnippets is
> > always a good thing.  Using --quiet is probably the best choice if
> > it's supported as far back as we need it to be.
> > 
> 
> The kill is completely redundant nowadays, since we have:
> 
> 
> --- GConf-2.18.0.1/gconf/gconftool.c.reload     2007-03-02
> 17:10:13.000000000 -0500
> +++ GConf-2.18.0.1/gconf/gconftool.c    2007-03-13 02:21:29.000000000
> -0400
> @@ -3780,6 +3780,8 @@
>        ++args;
>      }
> 
> +  g_spawn_command_line_sync ("/usr/bin/killall -q -TERM "
> GCONF_SERVERDIR "/" GCONFD, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); 
> +
>    retval |= do_sync (conf);
>    return retval;
>  }
Then gconftool should probably better 
Requires: /usr/bin/killall

Ralf