[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu>
- To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
- Date: 22 Sep 2007 00:15:54 -0500
>>>>> "MC" == Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com> writes:
MC> * Wed Feb 1 2006 Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com> 2.13.5-2
So that's a definite no for RHEL4 (looks like 2.8.1), but yes for FC5
and later. Which means Fedora doesn't care but EPEL does, and I think
we still try to keep our documents valid for EPEL.
- J<
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]