[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages

From: Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi>
To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 10:19:19 +0300

On Saturday 22 September 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> +  g_spawn_command_line_sync ("/usr/bin/killall -q -TERM "
> GCONF_SERVERDIR "/" GCONFD, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);

Hm, ScriptletSnippets advices to use -HUP; is -TERM instead of it intentional?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Michel Salim

References:
- [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages
  - From: Matthias Clasen

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]