Re: [Fedora-packaging] "gconfd-2: no process killed" messages

["Michel Salim" <michel sylvan gmail com>]

On 22/09/2007, Ville Skyttä <ville skytta iki fi> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > +  g_spawn_command_line_sync ("/usr/bin/killall -q -TERM "
> > GCONF_SERVERDIR "/" GCONFD, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>
> Hm, ScriptletSnippets advices to use -HUP; is -TERM instead of it intentional?
>
The next time an application uses GConf, the daemon is automatically
respawned anyway, right? So there should be no difference between -HUP
and -TERM.

-- 
Michel